A faith-based argument, not a scientific argument
7 September 2017 (rodneybrooks.com). Rodney Brooks, roboticist and former MIT AI Lab director, on arguments about future AI that cannot be refuted, in his September 2017 essay The Seven Deadly Sins of Predicting the Future of AI on his blog.
[FoR&AI] The Seven Deadly Sins of Predicting the Future of AI
More from Rodney Brooks · AI and hype · AI and safety · Before ChatGPT
Who else?
What it refers to: Arguments about imagined future technology so far beyond today's that its limits are unknown, such as claims about how powerful AGI will be.
Other voices
- “Kurzweil’s desperate hopes seriously cloud his scientific objectivity” Douglas R. Hofstadter,
- “The quadrillions of hypothetical digital minds are not” David Mills, Researcher,
- “It could kill us all by the end of the decade” Jacob Coxon, Researcher,
- “If you're not a little bit afraid at this moment then you're not paying attention” Mustafa Suleyman, Builder,
- “A superintelligent genie locked up in its bottle forever” Nick Bostrom, Thinker,
- “AI is automation technology” Emily Bender and Alex Hanna, Researcher,










