That is a very dangerous mentality for advanced AI systems
7 March 2025 (Fortune). Miles Brundage, OpenAI's former head of policy research, criticizing on X the company's 2025 blog post "How we think about safety and alignment" and its account of the GPT-2 release, March 2025.
OpenAI’s ex-policy lead accuses the company of ‘rewriting’ its AI safety history in new safety post
More from Miles Brundage · AI and safety · 2025
Who else?
What it refers to: A burden of proof in OpenAI's safety post treating concerns as alarmist unless backed by overwhelming evidence of imminent danger, otherwise models keep shipping.
Other voices
- “They planned the launch after-party prior to knowing if it was safe to launch” OpenAI whistleblower,
- “Those pledges serve mainly to highlight how far the walk is from the talk” Meredith Whittaker, Builder,
- “Just please don't do the thing that's going to get us all killed” Daniel Kokotajlo, Researcher,
- “Fear and unclear rules stymie AI safety work” Statement by three fired OpenAI researchers,
- “AI safety won't be solved by any single company working in secret” Clément Delangue, Builder,










